A few aspects of your application need to be considered when selecting an electronic examiner. A structured electronic template is provided to each reviewer. This template provides a step-by–step guide to organizing the review. It also provides information about conflict of interest and the role of the electronic examiner. A well-structured, electronic review is crucial for a quality application.
Electronic template structure
The Structured electronic reviews template was designed to aid reviewers in organizing their reviews. This template helps reviewers concentrate on the key findings and points. It also indicates revisions needed for publication and possible changes. It also identifies any referee queries that are relevant to the article. To provide feedback on manuscripts submitted, reviewers can use the template.
The journal's Structured electronic reviewing template was launched in August 2010. Over 80 reviews have been completed since August 2010, when the journal introduced the structured electronic reviewer template. This study investigates the effects of the structured electronic reviewing template on manuscript reviews.
Conflicts of Interest for Electronic Reviewers
Any conflict of interests should be disclosed to the journal by electronic reviewers. A conflict of interest is when a reviewer has an interest that could interfere with his or her ability to conduct a fair and objective evaluation of the work. Relevant commercial relationships include research grants, grants, materials and in-kind.
A reviewer's personal or business relationships can create conflicts of interest. These conflicts can arise from personal relationships, academic competition, or intellectual passion.